On April 2, 2014 the Washington Times had an article by Andrew P. Napolitano which contained several “what if” scenarios. It was thought provoking and inspired this alternative point of view.

President Obama is supposed to have taught Constitutional law. I would think that makes him an expert on its content and execution. And, yet, the press excuses his breaches of the Constitution by giving him a ‘benefit of the doubt’ pass. He cannot be an expert and oblivious simultaneously.
What if he studied the Constitution so that he could circumvent it?
What if his early mistakes in foreign diplomacy were a way of testing how much the media would let him get away with?
What if his college records were sealed because he wrote papers on how to collapse a free market system?
What if The czars he appointed are changing our policy and rules handbooks to discourage American ideals?
What if he has so much time to play golf because a puppet master is making policy decisions?
What if his increasing the national debt, lavish spending on vacations and websites that don’t work and failing green energy projects is an attempt to contribute to the bankruptcy of America?
What if the scandals of Benghazi, the IRS, the VA, Fast and Furious, (to name a few) were orchestrated by him or someone close to him in the White House?
What if the outrage he expressed at their revelation was just another lie? After all, he has done nothing to bring to justice any of the guilty parties; and he has failed to cooperate in disclosing relevant information.
What if his illegal implementation of the ‘Dream Act’ is meant to overwhelm our system of government or worse yet, mask the influx of criminals and terrorists through our southern border?
What if his unilateral actions,which ignore the co-equal branches of government, are a deliberate defiance of the rule of law? As a lawyer, he knows that intent is hard to prove.
What if releasing illegal criminals from prisons was a way to create popular chaos so that he could declare martial law and thus become the only voice of authority?
What if his ‘leading from behind’ policy is a subtle way of helping the terrorists?
What if the ‘change’ in his “hope and change” mantra means changing America from a free society to a caliphate?
Does all of this sound absurd? When you look at everything that has occurred in the last six years, can you present a valid defense for his actions? His team has used the race card as the reason people oppose his policies. That is not a rational argument! I believe he has used that card to his benefit and America’s detriment.
And, finally, has he intervened on behalf of American patriots and Christians imprisoned and tortured in foreign countries? His sympathies obviously are not with America.
What if…?

Before a President of the United States enters on the Execution of his Office, he takes the following Oath or Affirmation:— “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

A very simple oath and yet one that appears to have been misunderstood by the current president. His actions from the very beginning lean away from “protect and defend” and more toward “pretend to defend”.

Let’s start with the appointments of his many czars, some of whom have changed our text books and rule books to reflect a more favorable attitude toward criminals and a diminishing narrative of American history and values. On to “Fast and Furious” which resulted in the murder of border patrol agent Brian Terry. Speaking of murder, our loyal team in Benghazi, including our ambassador, were killed by terrorists who were never caught or prosecuted. Americans were fed a story about a video in an effort to appease anyone without a brain. Then we have the IRS scandal; this is an attempt to muzzle the free speech of anyone who does not agree with his majesty. There is the  ongoing destructive and interminable lies of Obamacare. And the VA scandal is proof that loyal Americans have no value to the administration of “change”. The latest debacle, releasing five high level Taliban leaders from Gitmo, seems to verify that this administration wants to destroy America. In my opinion, this malfeasance of office borders on treason.

With the revelation of each scandal, the president had the right words for America. “You can be sure…” or “Rest assured that the offenders will be brought to justice”. But there is no justice for America while this administration, with the only Attorney General to be held in contempt of Congress, reigns. Talk is cheap!  And to date, no one has been held accountable. No one has been prosecuted.

The president is supposed to be a Constitutional scholar and, yet, he has ignored Congress as if they were not a co-equal branch. As news reports reveal public outrage, he takes the podium to announce that he found out about it on the news. So, who in the heck is running the Oval Office, Steve Urkel? (Did I do that?) So many of the president’s actions have worked to impede the American way: skyrocketing debt, quantitative easing, downgrade of America’s credit rating, joblessness, excessive regulations, failure to implement programs that create good jobs, the list is too long to enumerate, and all point to the utter and complete annihilation of American ideals. The writing is on the wall in large graffiti like letters that are constantly painted over by the media in the name of “benefit of the doubt” or “executive privilege”. Someone has to be held accountable for the wrongdoings.

It pains me to use the race card but, if this president were white, he would have been impeached years ago.